Military Krav Maga
The army version of Krav Maga in the Israel Defense Forces. Unlike the civilian form, it assumes attack, a weapon and a mission to complete.
Quick Facts
IsraelCharacter & Origin
Organisation & Competition
What the style is built from
Editorial rating on a 0–3 scale, based on how much room each area gets in ordinary training.
Catalogs & Databases for Military Krav Maga
About Military Krav Maga
Military Krav Maga is the army version of Israeli close combat. It has no founder in the personal sense — it is a training syllabus of the armed forces — but its shape was set by Imi Lichtenfeld, who had been teaching the method in the Haganah and the Palmach since the mid-1940s and who became chief close-combat instructor after the Israel Defense Forces were established in 1948; he held the post until 1964. The year 1948 here therefore marks the founding of the army that adopted the method, not the origin of the method itself. The starting point was practical necessity. Recruits arrived from different countries with different ages and fitness levels, and training lasted weeks rather than years. The syllabus therefore dropped everything that requires long acquisition and built itself on a small number of movements derived from natural reactions, each usable against several different attacks. What separates it from the civilian version is the assumption, not the technique. A soldier is not to leave but to complete a mission, and he is expected to be armed and not to be acting alone. The syllabus therefore covers offensive use of rifle, pistol and knife, the transition from shooting to close combat and back, detaining and escorting a person, work in pairs, and fighting in confined space, in a vehicle and in built-up terrain. The actual content of IDF training is not public, and what civilian schools offer under the name "military Krav Maga" is a derivative, not the army syllabus. The amount taught also differs by unit: the basic course is short, while special units receive considerably more.
Similar styles
Selected by overlap in the style profile, not by historical lineage.